Recently, we have been seeing more and more brands using “experiential activity” as part of their advertising campaign. We know that experiential marketing campaigns can produce great content that can be used in both the traditional and social media channels and last week we had an in-depth look at two examples on our blog.
One got it right and one got it wrong. Want to check it out in its entirety? Go here.
The basic jist of it was as follows…
People love to relive experiences and with constant technological advancements, it has never been easier to document and share an experience. Ad agencies and brands are starting to realise the value of the experience, how it is now the core of a marketing communications plan and the ways in which mass media can be used to broadcast these real experiences.
The brands that get it right are the ones that put the experience first. Any content resulting from these is remarkable, real and adds value to the viewer. In our blog we looked at a staged “experience” from ING in Italy. The contrived nature of the advert became painfully obvious when looked at more closely and the fact it was listed in the TV directory of the Coloribus database (a global advertising archive) was a big clue as to ING’s motives from the outset.
Once upon a time we all talked about the T-mobile adverts but now they provide us with a great example of the implications of becoming complacent with your experiences and confusing a strategy. The first time the adverts hit our screen, we loved, laughed and most importantly believed what we were seeing. T-mobile appeared to be adding value to people’s lives… right up to the point they started creating experiences purely for TV. The ‘experience’ became tired and contrived.
The issue people have with most TV ads is that they are over the top, fake or too clever, meaning people don’t know what they are talking about. Ultimately the purpose of TV has always been for brand awareness, not engagement.
Ad agencies are great at creating TV spots, but can they really deliver a true ‘experience’ with the depth that is required for believability, which ultimately results in people being more connected to the brand?
In this consumer-savvy world we think not, but your thoughts would be appreciated.
Sally Durcan
MD, Hotcow Experiential Marketing Agency
www.hotcow.co.uk
@hotcow